Zilliqa vs UMA Token vs Hedera Hashgraph
What problem does this service solve?
Zilliqa is building a scalable development platform based on sharding. | UMA defines an open-source protocol to create and verify trustless financial contracts, making it easier to create financial DApps. | The Hedera Hashgraph consensus algorithm aims enable DApps where precise ordering and time recording of transactions is important. |
Token Stats
Company Description
Zilliqa is an innovative blockchain platform that is designed to be more scalable as the network grows. Zilliqa's platform is based on the concept of sharding; which involves breaking a large network of computers into smaller decentralized networks. | The UMA token is used to enable holders to participate in community governance issues and to help resolve contract disputes on the UMA platform. UMA is designed to be a decentralized financial contracts platform, and is an abbreviation of Universal Market Access. Their goal is to build the financial infrastructure that will make creating decentralized financial services easier. UMA provides a variety of smart contract templates as well as a decentralized oracle that can be used to validate payouts related to financial contracts. | Hedera Hashgraph is a blockchain network that was designed to allow developers to create DApps that require higher throughput and faster settlement. Hedera uses its own consensus protocol that assigns every transaction a consensus time that is calculated as the median of the times at which each node in the network first received it. The network is powered by the HBAR coin. |
![](https://www.blockchainalmanac.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/error_content.jpg)