Zilliqa vs UMA Token vs ConsenSys
What problem does this service solve?
Zilliqa is building a scalable development platform based on sharding. | UMA defines an open-source protocol to create and verify trustless financial contracts, making it easier to create financial DApps. | ConsenSys' goal is to create the infrastructure, applications, and practices that will enable greater adoption of blockchain. |
Token Stats
Not Relevant |
Company Description
Zilliqa is an innovative blockchain platform that is designed to be more scalable as the network grows. Zilliqa's platform is based on the concept of sharding; which involves breaking a large network of computers into smaller decentralized networks. | The UMA token is used to enable holders to participate in community governance issues and to help resolve contract disputes on the UMA platform. UMA is designed to be a decentralized financial contracts platform, and is an abbreviation of Universal Market Access. Their goal is to build the financial infrastructure that will make creating decentralized financial services easier. UMA provides a variety of smart contract templates as well as a decentralized oracle that can be used to validate payouts related to financial contracts. | ConsenSys is one of the most influential blockchain technology companies. They are working on a variety of projects to create the infrastructure and applications that will enable scalable adoption of blockchain-based systems. The company's efforts are focused on the Ethereum ecosystem, and include divisions working to advance technology development, establish industry standards, and provide consulting, marketing, and education services. |