Unibright vs Bytom vs EdenChain
What problem does this service solve?
Unibright aims to create a unified framework for companies to integrate blockchain with their existing business systems. | Bytom aims to create a secondary market for physical assets registered to their blockchain | EdenChain aims to create a high performance blockchain for enterprises, that will allow them to convert assets into digital tokens. |
Token Stats
Company Description
Unibright is a German Blockchain development company. Their platform is designed to assist clients with setting up and deploying smart contracts; as well as integrating their existing business systems with blockchain-based ledgers. The Unibright network is powered by the Ethereum-based UBT token. | Bytom is a Chinese company that is developing a blockchain platform that is specifically designed to register securities and physical assets to the Bytom blockchain. Bytom aims to create a secondary markets for these blockchain registered assets and will allow them to be tokenized. | EdenChain is developing an enterprise tokenization platform that will be based on their permissioned blockchain technology. Their goal is to enable enterprises to create customized digital assets based on their unique needs, and still maintain a high degree of control and privacy. EdenChain will use Merkle Tree and Namespace technology to solve performance issues by executing transactions in parallel; thus enabling more transactions per second, with lower transaction fees. EdenChain utilizes both a hardware and software solution to arrive at a consensus, and has a triple layer architecture that is significantly different from other tokenization platforms. Their hybrid consensus mechanism that will combine a protocol called Median Voter Thereom (MVT) with Proof-of-Elapsed-Time (PoET). PoET was designed and marketed by Intel, and is similar to PoW but requires less electricity. The company issued an Ethereum-based token called EDN. |