TrueChain vs Infura vs Neblio
What problem does this service solve?
TrueChain wants to improve blockchain performance with a hybrid consensus model. | Infura's developer tools make it easier for DApps to access Ethereum and IPFS. | Neblio goal is to make it easier for developers to make DApps. |
Token Stats
Not Relevant |
Company Description
TrueChain is developing a secure and scalable blockchain platform with a strong developer community. TrueChain hopes to improve upon current platforms with a hybrid consensus protocol called Minerva. This hybrid model will combine a consensus mechanism based on Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (pBFT) with a FruitChain-based Proof-of-Work protocol. Fruitchain is designed to minimize the incentives of mining pools by decreasing the variance of mining rewards; making the network more decentralized. | Infura is a DApp infrastructure provider that was created by ConsenSys and gives developers the tools to securely access Ethereum and IPFS. Their API enables users to set up Ethereum Nodes, and then install, configure, and maintain the Ethereum infrastructure more easily, and at lower cost. Infura was originally created by ConsenSys. | Neblio is developing an enterprise blockchain solution that will allow developers to create DApps more easily. Their marketing materials place a strong emphasis on improving the speed at which data can be synced with their blockchain-based platform. Neblio has a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism and is powered by the NEBL token. |