TrueChain vs Elrond vs Veritaseum
What problem does this service solve?
TrueChain wants to improve blockchain performance with a hybrid consensus model. | Elrond will allow developers to create more scalable DApps with faster transaction times. | Veritaseum provides blockchain-based software solutions for financial clients. Their network makes it easier for clients to create their own sub-tokens and decentralized applications to interact with capital markets. |
Token Stats
Company Description
TrueChain is developing a secure and scalable blockchain platform with a strong developer community. TrueChain hopes to improve upon current platforms with a hybrid consensus protocol called Minerva. This hybrid model will combine a consensus mechanism based on Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (pBFT) with a FruitChain-based Proof-of-Work protocol. Fruitchain is designed to minimize the incentives of mining pools by decreasing the variance of mining rewards; making the network more decentralized. | The Elrond blockchain platform is designed to be a public development infrastructure that will be more secure, efficient, and scalable than other blockchain platforms. The Elrond blockchain is aimed at DApp developers and enterprises. Elrond will have a Prof of Stake consensus mechanism, and will include an Adaptive State Sharding feature that will allow multiple validators to process transactions in parallel. | Veritaseum develops blockchain-based software solutions for capital markets. Their goal is to decentralize access to these markets, with both centralized and decentralized solutions, for a range of financial institutions. The company assists their clients in building bespoke decentralized applications. Veritaseum's software solutions are built upon their platform, which allows for the creation of Veritas sub-tokens that serve the specific needs of the client. |