QuarkChain vs Unibright vs HYCON
 |  |  |
| | |
What problem does this service solve?
| QuarkChain hopes to create a more scalable blockchain platform that will have faster transaction times. | Unibright aims to create a unified framework for companies to integrate blockchain with their existing business systems. | HYCON's DAG/SPECTRE consensus is designed to improve blockchain performance by enabling more than one block to be added to the main chain. |
Token Stats
Company Description
QuarkChain is building a blockchain with a focus on speed and scalability. They hope to significantly improve transaction times and reduce fees with an architecture that will rely on a two-layered blockchain and elastic sharding. QuarkChain uses a hybrid Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism that is ASIC-resistant. Transactions are first confirmed on one blockchain layer, and then on the second. The network will be powered by the QKC coin. | Unibright is a German Blockchain development company. Their platform is designed to assist clients with setting up and deploying smart contracts; as well as integrating their existing business systems with blockchain-based ledgers. The Unibright network is powered by the Ethereum-based UBT token. | HYCON is a blockchain platform powered by the Hyperconnected Coin. The decentralized platform has a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) architecture, and is focused on improving scalability and throughput. HYCON's SPECTRE consensus algorithm is designed to enable horizontal scalability, where several blocks can be added at the same time. \ |
