QuarkChain vs HYCON vs LTO Network
 |  |  |
| | |
What problem does this service solve?
| QuarkChain hopes to create a more scalable blockchain platform that will have faster transaction times. | HYCON's DAG/SPECTRE consensus is designed to improve blockchain performance by enabling more than one block to be added to the main chain. | LTO Network's goal is to use blockchain to add efficiency and automation to organizational workflows. |
Token Stats
Company Description
QuarkChain is building a blockchain with a focus on speed and scalability. They hope to significantly improve transaction times and reduce fees with an architecture that will rely on a two-layered blockchain and elastic sharding. QuarkChain uses a hybrid Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism that is ASIC-resistant. Transactions are first confirmed on one blockchain layer, and then on the second. The network will be powered by the QKC coin. | HYCON is a blockchain platform powered by the Hyperconnected Coin. The decentralized platform has a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) architecture, and is focused on improving scalability and throughput. HYCON's SPECTRE consensus algorithm is designed to enable horizontal scalability, where several blocks can be added at the same time. \ | The LTO Network is a blockchain platform designed to automate workflows and collaboration between organizations. The company places an emphasis on ensuring regulatory compliance. Their network has a hybrid architecture that combines elements of private and public blockchains. |
