HYCON vs GoWithMi vs QuarkChain
 |  |  |
| | |
What problem does this service solve?
| HYCON's DAG/SPECTRE consensus is designed to improve blockchain performance by enabling more than one block to be added to the main chain. | GoWithMi's goal is to create a more private and efficient geolocation service. | QuarkChain hopes to create a more scalable blockchain platform that will have faster transaction times. |
Token Stats
Company Description
HYCON is a blockchain platform powered by the Hyperconnected Coin. The decentralized platform has a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) architecture, and is focused on improving scalability and throughput. HYCON's SPECTRE consensus algorithm is designed to enable horizontal scalability, where several blocks can be added at the same time. \ | GoWithMi is developing a decentralized location-based services (DLBS) infrastructure. GoWithMi aims to create a comprehensive geolocation network that will provide incentives for users to contribute location data, and will support cross-chain communication. The network is powered by the Ethereum-based GMAT token. | QuarkChain is building a blockchain with a focus on speed and scalability. They hope to significantly improve transaction times and reduce fees with an architecture that will rely on a two-layered blockchain and elastic sharding. QuarkChain uses a hybrid Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism that is ASIC-resistant. Transactions are first confirmed on one blockchain layer, and then on the second. The network will be powered by the QKC coin. |
