HYCON vs GoWithMi vs Matic Network
 |  |  |
| | |
What problem does this service solve?
| HYCON's DAG/SPECTRE consensus is designed to improve blockchain performance by enabling more than one block to be added to the main chain. | GoWithMi's goal is to create a more private and efficient geolocation service. | Matic provides scalability for DApps and smart contracts. |
Token Stats
Company Description
HYCON is a blockchain platform powered by the Hyperconnected Coin. The decentralized platform has a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) architecture, and is focused on improving scalability and throughput. HYCON's SPECTRE consensus algorithm is designed to enable horizontal scalability, where several blocks can be added at the same time. \ | GoWithMi is developing a decentralized location-based services (DLBS) infrastructure. GoWithMi aims to create a comprehensive geolocation network that will provide incentives for users to contribute location data, and will support cross-chain communication. The network is powered by the Ethereum-based GMAT token. | The Matic Network is a sidechain based scaling solution for public blockchains. Matic aims to allow developers to better scale their Ethereum DApps by using a version of Plasma, along with side chains that use a PoS consensus mechanism. Matic plans on supporting other blockchains as well in order to facilitate interoperability. |
