HYCON vs Fantom vs Unibright
 |  |  |
| | |
What problem does this service solve?
| HYCON's DAG/SPECTRE consensus is designed to improve blockchain performance by enabling more than one block to be added to the main chain. | Fantom wants to create a better performing smart contract platform that will based on a directed acyclic graph. | Unibright aims to create a unified framework for companies to integrate blockchain with their existing business systems. |
Token Stats
Company Description
HYCON is a blockchain platform powered by the Hyperconnected Coin. The decentralized platform has a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) architecture, and is focused on improving scalability and throughput. HYCON's SPECTRE consensus algorithm is designed to enable horizontal scalability, where several blocks can be added at the same time. \ | Fantom is developing a smart contract platform based on a directed acyclic graph (DAG). They hope to address the scalability issues of current decentralized platforms. Instead of a blockchain, Fantom's Lachesis Protocol uses a directed acyclic graph to confirm transactions asynchronously. This transaction history is immutable and cannot be modified. The platform's Opera Chain will consist of three layers: an application Layer, Opera Ware Layer, and Opera Core Layer. Fanotm issued an Ethereum-based token in 2018. | Unibright is a German Blockchain development company. Their platform is designed to assist clients with setting up and deploying smart contracts; as well as integrating their existing business systems with blockchain-based ledgers. The Unibright network is powered by the Ethereum-based UBT token. |
