GoWithMi vs QLC Chain vs CanonChain
What problem does this service solve?
GoWithMi's goal is to create a more private and efficient geolocation service. | QLC is building a DApp development platform designed to encourage greater decentralization. | CannonChain's consensus mechanism encourages contributing network resources on smaller scales. |
Token Stats
Company Description
GoWithMi is developing a decentralized location-based services (DLBS) infrastructure. GoWithMi aims to create a comprehensive geolocation network that will provide incentives for users to contribute location data, and will support cross-chain communication. The network is powered by the Ethereum-based GMAT token. | QLC Chain, formerly known as QLink, is developing a Network-as-a-Service blokchain platform. It will allow them to provide decentralized network services and serve as a DApp development platform. The QLC network is currently built on NEO but will transition to their own blockchain in the future. The QLC Chain will have a hybrid consensus mechanism called Shannon consensus. It will combine elements of delegated Proof-of-Stake (dPoS) with a regulating mechanism that is designed to encourage participation by more nodes. | CanonChain is developing an underlying blockchain protocol based on Fog networking and a Proof-of-Participation (PoP) consensus mechanism. Their network is designed to provide incentives for contributing computing resources on fragmented networks, and is powered by the Ethereum-based CZR token, known as Xuanchi. |