GoWithMi vs Penta vs Hedera Hashgraph
What problem does this service solve?
GoWithMi's goal is to create a more private and efficient geolocation service. | Penta does not appear to solve any problems better than existing blockchain platforms. | The Hedera Hashgraph consensus algorithm aims enable DApps where precise ordering and time recording of transactions is important. |
Token Stats
Company Description
GoWithMi is developing a decentralized location-based services (DLBS) infrastructure. GoWithMi aims to create a comprehensive geolocation network that will provide incentives for users to contribute location data, and will support cross-chain communication. The network is powered by the Ethereum-based GMAT token. | Penta is developing a blockchain platform that DApps can be built on. It will have a Dynamic Stake Consensus (DSC) algorithm to confirm transactions. The Penta network is currently powered by the Ethereum-based PNT token. | Hedera Hashgraph is a blockchain network that was designed to allow developers to create DApps that require higher throughput and faster settlement. Hedera uses its own consensus protocol that assigns every transaction a consensus time that is calculated as the median of the times at which each node in the network first received it. The network is powered by the HBAR coin. |