GoWithMi vs Neblio vs HYCON
 |  |  |
| | |
What problem does this service solve?
| GoWithMi's goal is to create a more private and efficient geolocation service. | Neblio goal is to make it easier for developers to make DApps. | HYCON's DAG/SPECTRE consensus is designed to improve blockchain performance by enabling more than one block to be added to the main chain. |
Token Stats
Company Description
GoWithMi is developing a decentralized location-based services (DLBS) infrastructure. GoWithMi aims to create a comprehensive geolocation network that will provide incentives for users to contribute location data, and will support cross-chain communication. The network is powered by the Ethereum-based GMAT token. | Neblio is developing an enterprise blockchain solution that will allow developers to create DApps more easily. Their marketing materials place a strong emphasis on improving the speed at which data can be synced with their blockchain-based platform. Neblio has a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism and is powered by the NEBL token. | HYCON is a blockchain platform powered by the Hyperconnected Coin. The decentralized platform has a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) architecture, and is focused on improving scalability and throughput. HYCON's SPECTRE consensus algorithm is designed to enable horizontal scalability, where several blocks can be added at the same time. \ |
