GoChain vs Veritaseum vs TrueChain
What problem does this service solve?
GoChain's hopes to create a blockchain platform that will have faster transaction time and volumes, and also improve energy efficiency. | Veritaseum provides blockchain-based software solutions for financial clients. Their network makes it easier for clients to create their own sub-tokens and decentralized applications to interact with capital markets. | TrueChain wants to improve blockchain performance with a hybrid consensus model. |
Token Stats
Company Description
GoChain is building a blockchain focused on speed and scalability. GoChain's protocol uses a Proof-of-Reputation (PoR) consensus mechanism and will be powered by the GO coin. They hope to significantly improve transaction times and reduce fee with an architecture that will rely on nodes managed by large enterprises. Their marketing materials places a strong emphasis on energy efficiency and reducing the monopolizing influence of large mining operations that have reduced the decentralization of other networks. | Veritaseum develops blockchain-based software solutions for capital markets. Their goal is to decentralize access to these markets, with both centralized and decentralized solutions, for a range of financial institutions. The company assists their clients in building bespoke decentralized applications. Veritaseum's software solutions are built upon their platform, which allows for the creation of Veritas sub-tokens that serve the specific needs of the client. | TrueChain is developing a secure and scalable blockchain platform with a strong developer community. TrueChain hopes to improve upon current platforms with a hybrid consensus protocol called Minerva. This hybrid model will combine a consensus mechanism based on Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (pBFT) with a FruitChain-based Proof-of-Work protocol. Fruitchain is designed to minimize the incentives of mining pools by decreasing the variance of mining rewards; making the network more decentralized. |