Credits vs TrueChain vs DAPP Network
What problem does this service solve?
Credits hopes to create a blockchain platform that will have faster transaction time and will handle larger volumes. | TrueChain wants to improve blockchain performance with a hybrid consensus model. | The DAPP Network aims to be an incentive driven network for collaboration that will address the technical barriers for creating scalable DApps. |
Token Stats
Not Relevant |
Company Description
Credits is building a blockchain platform focused on speed and scalability. Credits' protocol uses a Delegated Proof-of-Stake (dPoS) consensus mechanism and will be powered by the CS coin. They hope to significantly improve transaction times and reduce fees. | TrueChain is developing a secure and scalable blockchain platform with a strong developer community. TrueChain hopes to improve upon current platforms with a hybrid consensus protocol called Minerva. This hybrid model will combine a consensus mechanism based on Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (pBFT) with a FruitChain-based Proof-of-Work protocol. Fruitchain is designed to minimize the incentives of mining pools by decreasing the variance of mining rewards; making the network more decentralized. | The DAPP Network is a development focused network that aims to promote the adoption of decentralized applications (DApps). The DAPP Network is designed to incentivize the creation of development tools to solve the technical limitations of developing DApps. The network is powered by the DAPP token. |