What problem does this service solve?

Credits hopes to create a blockchain platform that will have faster transaction time and will handle larger volumes.

QuarkChain hopes to create a more scalable blockchain platform that will have faster transaction times.

ThunderCore's goal is to allow developers to create fast and scalable DApps that are compatible with Ethereum.

Token Stats

Company Description

Credits is building a blockchain platform focused on speed and scalability. Credits' protocol uses a Delegated Proof-of-Stake (dPoS) consensus mechanism and will be powered by the CS coin. They hope to significantly improve transaction times and reduce fees.

QuarkChain is building a blockchain with a focus on speed and scalability. They hope to significantly improve transaction times and reduce fees with an architecture that will rely on a two-layered blockchain and elastic sharding. QuarkChain uses a hybrid Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism that is ASIC-resistant. Transactions are first confirmed on one blockchain layer, and then on the second. The network will be powered by the QKC coin.

ThunderCore is a Proof of Stake blockchain that is powered by the native Thunder Token. ThunderCore is compatible with Ethereum and is designed to have fast confirmation times. Transactions are verified by consensus nodes that complete a round of voting to confirm transactions in under one second. The network's compatibility with Ethereum is intended to allow developers to easily migrate DApps to the platform.

Ratings

Overall	(0)	(0)	(0)
How useful is this tool in creating decentralized applications?
How does this platform compare to similar development tools?
How effective is this tool in encouraging blockchain adoption?
How scalable is this platform?
How likely is it that this tool will still be used in 10 years?

Credits vs QuarkChain vs ThunderCore

Credits

QuarkChain

ThunderCore