What problem does this service solve?

Credits hopes to create a blockchain platform that will have faster transaction time and will handle larger volumes.

Hyperion's goal is to create a decentralized marketplace for map data that will be generated by users.

MetaHash's goal is to create a faster blockchain platform that will enable better DApp performance.

Token Stats

Company Description

Credits is building a blockchain platform focused on speed and scalability. Credits' protocol uses a Delegated Proof-of-Stake (dPoS) consensus mechanism and will be powered by the CS coin. They hope to significantly improve transaction times and reduce fees.

Hyperion is developing a decentralized mapping platform that will ensure user privacy and provide map services for DApps. The platform will give users incentives to contribute location data and will have a community governance model. The Hyperion network is powered by the Ethereum-based HYN token.

MetaHash is developing a blockchain platform for creating DApps. Their network has a multi Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism that is designed to increase transaction speeds and block formation times by using all of the nodes on the network.

Ratings

Overall	(0)	(0)	(0)
How useful is this tool in creating decentralized applications?
How does this platform compare to similar development tools?
How effective is this tool in encouraging blockchain adoption?
How scalable is this platform?
How likely is it that this tool will still be used in 10 years?

Credits vs Hyperion vs MetaHash

Credits

Hyperion

MetaHash