What problem does this service solve?

Credits hopes to create a blockchain platform that will have faster transaction time and will handle larger volumes.

Fantom wants to create a better performing smart contract platform that will based on a directed acyclic graph.

Universa aims to enable faster transactions and smart contracts that can be executed offline.

Token Stats

Company Description

Credits is building a blockchain platform focused on speed and scalability. Credits' protocol uses a Delegated Proof-of-Stake (dPoS) consensus mechanism and will be powered by the CS coin. They hope to significantly improve transaction times and reduce fees.

Fantom is developing a smart contract platform based on a directed acyclic graph (DAG). They hope to address the scalability issues of current decentralized platforms. Instead of a blockchain, Fantom's Lachesis Protocol uses a directed acyclic graph to confirm transactions asynchronously. This transaction history is immutable and cannot be modified. The platform's Opera Chain will consist of three layers: an application Layer, Opera Ware Layer, and Opera Core Layer. Fanotm issued an Ethereum-based token in 2018.

Universa is developing a customizable blockchain platform that will enable real-time transactions, offline smart contracts, and escrow payments. Their network is currently powered by the Ethereum-based UNTP token.

Ratings

Overall	(0)	(0)	(0)
How useful is this tool in creating decentralized applications?
How does this platform compare to similar development tools?
How effective is this tool in encouraging blockchain adoption?
How scalable is this platform?
How likely is it that this tool will still be used in 10 years?

Credits vs Fantom vs Universa

Credits

Fantom

Universa