ChainLink vs OneRoot Network vs Aeternity
What problem does this service solve?
ChainLink wants to solve the connectivity problem facing smart decentralized applications. By connecting smart contracts to external data resources, many potential use cases for blockchain can be opened up. | The OneRoot Network wants to create a development platform for DApps. | Aeternity uses a hybrid consensus protocol that aims to improve smart contract platforms and allow the use of real world data. |
Token Stats
Company Description
ChainLink is developing the LINK Network, which will enable connected smart contracts. LINK will provide smart contracts with a variety of external data and access to APIs. ChainLink's goal is to solve the connectivity problem that plagues smart contract based systems, and discourages mass adoption. Many decentralized applications are unable to connect with important external data sources due to limitations involving their consensus protocols. The LINK network wants to connect their smart contracts with external systems and APIs by using secure middleware. | The OneRoot Network hopes to create a blockchain development platform that will provide a development infrastructure for DApps, and a decentralized exchange. The OneRoot consensus mechanism is based on the concept of co-building. The company's whitepaper and marketing materials are unclear regarding its technical details and project vision. | Aeternity is a smart contract driven blockchain platform that aims to integrate real world data and improve the overall performance of smart contracts. Aeternity has a hybrid consensus algorithm that combines PoW for verifying transactions, and PoS for governance purposes. The platform is based on a system of state channels that allow users to interact privately with each other and record this information off-chain. |