ZClassic

by ZClassic

(0)
View Profile

Ripple

by Ripple Labs

(0)
View Profile

Bitcoin Cash SV

by Bitcoin Cash SV

(0)
View Profile

ZClassic

by ZClassic

(0)
View Profile

Ripple

by Ripple Labs

(0)
View Profile

Bitcoin Cash SV

by Bitcoin Cash SV

(0)
View Profile

What problem does this service solve?

ZClassic is a fork of ZCash. The key differences are that ZClassic doesn't charge miners a fee and there are no limitations to create artificial scarcity in the coin supply.Ripple is an exchange and remittance network that aims to to allow fast financial transactions between banks, at minimal cost. Its protocol is built upon an open source distributed consensus ledger. XRP is the native currency that acts as a bridge currency between financial institutions to settle payments.Bitcoin Cash SV aims to improve transaction speeds by increasing the block size of the Bitcoin Cash protocol.

Token Stats

Company Description

ZClassic is a privacy focused crytpocurrency that is a fork of ZCash. ZClassic enables a high degree of privacy and anonymity of transactions.The key differences between ZClassic and ZCash are the elimination of the 20% mining fee that are allocated as a "founders' reward" and the removal of ZCash's block limit, that was intended to create scarcity.

Ripple is a real-time settlement and remittance network that is designed for the banking industry. Its settlement infrastructure technology has been adopted by a growing list of financial institutions looking to leverage the benefits of distributed ledgers. Ripple's real-time settlement network connects banks and enables cross border settlements and transactions in real-time. The current settlement infrastructure requires many intermediaries, and performing transactions take time and cost money. Ripple provides the underlying infrastructure for banks, and enables these transactions to be executed directly at almost no cost.

Bitcoin Cash SV is a cryptocurrency that was created as a result of a hard fork of the Bitcoin Cash blockchain that occurred on November 15, 2018. The central issue that led to the hard fork of Bitcoin Cash was a debate among prominent members of the Bitcoin Cash community regarding block size. A larger block size can improve transaction times, but also lead to greater network centralization. Roger Ver, an influential cryptocurrency advocate, was one of the central figures in favor of keeping the smaller 32 MB block size, while Craig Wright, the chief scientist at nChain, favored a larger 128 MB block size. The division between these two factions led to the hard fork that created Bitcoin Cash ABC and Bitcoin Cash SV.

Ratings

(0)

(0)

(0)