Nano vs BOMB vs Gulden
 |  |  |
| | |
What problem does this service solve?
| Nano has a unique blockchain structure that enables almost instant transactions with no fees. | BOMB's goal is to be a decentralized hedge against traditional inflationary currencies. | Gulden allows users to make P2P payments. It has gained some adoption in the Netherlands, but it does not appear to have any significant advantages to other coins. |
Token Stats
Company Description
Nano, formerly known as Railblocks, is a cryptocurrency that is focused on enabling fast transactions with no fees. Nano's innovative blockchain architecture utilizes a block lattice structure that does not need miners to confirm transactions. . | BOMB is an Ethereum based token that is designed to be a deflationary cryptocurrency self-destructing currency. The project is meant to be a social experiment and financial case study to determine the feasibility of a deflationary currency. There were originally 1,000,000 BOMB in circulation, and 1% of each transaction is destroyed. | Gulden is a Dutch cryptocurrency based on a native blockchain with a Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism. Gulden has gained traction in the Netherlands, where it can be used to make P2P payments, as well as send funds to an IBAN account. Gulden's marketing efforts emphasize the network's security and faster transaction times. Gulden's PoW² consensus combines aspects of PoS with PoW, and allows witnesses to add transactions to blocks after they have been mined. The network is powered by the NLG coin. |
