Gulden vs Nano vs QChi
 |  |  |
| | |
What problem does this service solve?
| Gulden allows users to make P2P payments. It has gained some adoption in the Netherlands, but it does not appear to have any significant advantages to other coins. | Nano has a unique blockchain structure that enables almost instant transactions with no fees. | Qchi does not appear to solve any problems that are not being addressed by other projects. |
Token Stats
Company Description
Gulden is a Dutch cryptocurrency based on a native blockchain with a Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism. Gulden has gained traction in the Netherlands, where it can be used to make P2P payments, as well as send funds to an IBAN account. Gulden's marketing efforts emphasize the network's security and faster transaction times. Gulden's PoW² consensus combines aspects of PoS with PoW, and allows witnesses to add transactions to blocks after they have been mined. The network is powered by the NLG coin. | Nano, formerly known as Railblocks, is a cryptocurrency that is focused on enabling fast transactions with no fees. Nano's innovative blockchain architecture utilizes a block lattice structure that does not need miners to confirm transactions. . | QChi is an Ethereum-based token with no clear benefits. Their marketing materials do not provide any specific information about their roadmap or what advantages it offers compared to other cryptocurrencies. |
