Microsoft Blockchain on Azure vs Hewlett Packard Mission Critical DLT vs Oracle Blockchain Cloud Service
What problem does this service solve?
Microsoft's BaaS solution provides customers with a set of templates that easily be configured and will deploy a variety of blockchain structures. | Hewlett Packard's Mission Critical DLT enables customers to run distributed ledger with other enterprise platforms. | Oracle Blockchain Cloud Service is part of Oracle's suite of software solutions for enterprises. It provides the advantages of blokchain technology and can be easily integrated with their other products. |
Token Stats
Not Relevant | Not Relevant | Not Relevant |
Company Description
Microsoft Blockchain on Azure allows companies to deploy distributed ledger applications with minimal blockchain knowledge. Microsoft is the biggest software company in the world, and its BaaS solution has a number of advantages. Clients are able to quickly create a fully configured blockchain network, allowing them to on focus on building their applications. Customers are charged for the storage, networking, and computing resources that they consume. | Hewlett Packard's blockchain as a service platform, called Mission Critical Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), allows its customers to run distributed ledger processes on an enterprise platform. HP developed this solution in conjunction with R3, and is now offering it as a BaaS option to their enterprise customers. | Oracle Blockchain Cloud Service is part of Oracle’s comprehensive Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) portfolio. Oracle's Blockchain Cloud Service is part of the Oracle platform, which is already widely used by a wide range of companies, and consists of a variety of SaaS tools. They hope to combine their existing offerings with blockchain capabilities to assist their customers in deploying applications. |